I’ve noticed recently that the word ‘automation’ can be used very loosely in the EDA industry as a presumption of productivity and quality. Here is a quirky take on 'Automation without abstraction'
« IP-XACT Usage Survey Results | Main | IP Integration : What is the difference between stitching and weaving? »
11/19/2010
The comments to this entry are closed.
Recent Posts
- SID at DVCON2012
- IP Integration : What is the difference between stitching and weaving?
- IP-XACT Usage Survey Results
- IP-XACT : What next? You decide!
- IP-XACT coming back on track
- DAC2010 : Nose wipes, no swipes, and nose swipes
- DAC:2010 - Vowels, Gnats and Hubs.
- Realizing the EDA360 Vision
- Cadence spots the elephant!
Recent Comments
- David Murray on IP Integration : What is the difference between stitching and weaving?
- David Courtright on IP Integration : What is the difference between stitching and weaving?
- David Murray on Realizing the EDA360 Vision
- David Murray on Realizing the EDA360 Vision
- Steve Brown on Realizing the EDA360 Vision
- Msiwinski on Realizing the EDA360 Vision
- Mike on Acceleration and Emulation and ... ... and centralization
Comments